INTERNATIONAL REHABILITATION
AND SOIL STABILISATION SERVICES
Wetland Project Data Summary |
|||
Student Initials: |
Student Number: |
Demonstrator Group : A (Wednesday) |
|
LOCATION DETAILS |
|||
Name of waterbody |
Booragoon lake |
||
Longitude |
90.4E |
Latitude |
53.8N |
Date of sampling |
10/3/04 |
Season |
Autumn |
Weather at time of sampling |
Fine and sunny; 29°C with sparse cirrus cloud and a breeze; no rain was recorded in the past 24 hours |
||
Classification & water regime |
|
Comments |
|
Category of wetland (Undisturbed, created, urban, agricultural, coloured, saline, acidic, etc) |
Semi- disturbed, natural urban wetland |
|
|
Semeniuk Vegetation Classification |
zoniform |
|
|
Water regime (permanent, seasonal, episodic) |
Permanent |
Water level varies with season but is present all year round with the rare exceptions of anomalies |
|
Mean depth of sampling sites (X ± SE) (n) |
9.5 ± 7.1 |
One site had no water, which dragged the average down considerably (4 sites) |
|
Estimated maximum depth of wetland |
30cm |
This summer was an anomalous year and water level is extra low; also much deeper in winter |
|
Soil association |
Bassendean Dunes |
|
|
Sediment types |
Mud and silt |
Probably detritus also |
|
Water Quality |
|
|
|
Temperature °C |
28.5 |
Ranged from 16.2 to 35.2 (19°C difference) |
|
pH (X ± SE) (n) |
8.65 ± 0.11 |
(4 sites) |
|
conductivity (µS/cm) (X ± SE) (n) |
5210 ± 250 |
(4 sites) |
|
gilvin (g440/m) (X ± SE) (n) |
77.99 ± 14.50 |
Range: 44.22 - 164.43 (4 sites) |
|
turbidity (NTU) (X ± SE) (n) |
225 ± 23.1 |
(4 sites) |
|
Secchi disc (m) (n) |
0.074 ± 0.007 |
(4 sites) |
|
P04 (µg/l) (n) |
4750 ± 845 |
(4 sites) |
|
NH4 (µg/l) (n) |
2290 ± 127.5 |
(4 sites) |
|
N03 (µg/l) (n) |
1100 ± 273.3 |
(3 sites) |
|
chlorophyll a (µg/l) (n) |
400 ± 84 |
(3 sites) |
|
Aquatic Plants |
|
||
Total no. of species |
8 |
|
|
Total no. of macrophyte species |
0 |
|
|
Total no. of algal species |
8 |
|
|
Names of most abundant macrophyte taxa |
|
|
|
Names of most abundant algal taxa |
Chlamydomonas, Microcystis |
|
|
Total per cent cover |
95% |
|
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
95% |
|
|
Exotic index |
0 |
|
|
Health (excellent/average/poor) |
Poor |
Would not normally be so bad (probably average) |
|
Fringing Vegetation |
|
|
|
No. of plant communities |
1 |
|
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
67 |
Averaged of estimated data |
|
Dominant community 1: |
|
|
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
60 |
|
|
Names of most abundant taxa |
Maleleuca raphiophylla |
|
|
Structure index |
2 |
|
|
Exotic index |
62 |
Data sets range from 0 - 100% |
|
Dominant community 2: |
|
||
Percent of wetland area covered |
|
||
Total number of species |
|
||
Names of most abundant taxa |
|
||
Structure index |
|
||
Total % cover (up to 300%) |
|
||
Exotic index |
|
||
Health (excellent/average/poor) |
|
||
Terrestrial Vegetation |
|
||
No. of plant communities |
2 |
|
|
Percent of wetland perimeter covered |
75% |
|
|
Dominant community |
|
||
Percent of wetland perimeter covered |
70 |
|
|
Total number of species |
18 |
|
|
Names of most abundant taxa |
Eucalyptus calophylla Eucalyptus marginata |
|
|
Structure index |
2 |
Seems very high for an urban wetland! |
|
Exotic index |
53.5% |
Gr AA had high exotic index and "excellent" health. Am I missing something or are they? |
|
Aquatic Invertebrates |
|
||
Mean no. of taxa (X ± SE) (n) |
2.5 ± 0.7 |
(2 sites) one group did not complete this section and another had no water to analyse |
|
Names of most abundant taxa |
Corixidae |
|
|
Mean no. of predatory E) (n) |
2 |
(data for one site only) |
|
Indicator species present |
Chironomidae |
|
|
Dominance of Insecta vs Crustacea |
Insecta |
|
|
State(clear, macrophyte-dominated/ turbid , phytoplankton dominated/clear, benthic mat dominated) |
turbid |
|
|
Human Impacts |
|
||
Disturbance (high/med/low):in water |
med |
|
|
Disturbance (high/med/low):in fringing vegetation |
med |
Some litter, drains, cleared for roadways, boardwalk, high exotic species index |
|
Number of drains |
4 |
|
|