INTERNATIONAL REHABILITATION
AND SOIL STABILISATION SERVICES
Wetland Project Data Summary |
|||
Student Initials: K.P. |
Student Number: 30178745 |
Demonstrator Group : A (Wednesday) |
|
LOCATION DETAILS |
|||
Name of waterbody |
Tomato Lake; Belmont |
||
Longitude |
90.4E |
Latitude |
53.8N |
Date of sampling |
24/4, 28/4, 1/5, 5/5, 8/5/2004 |
Season |
Autumn |
Weather at time of sampling |
24/4, 28/4 – fine, sunny, a.a.t. ~22 degrees C at 8.30am 1/5, 5/5 – fine, sunny, cloud approaching; 8/5 – overcast, threatening to rain |
||
Classification & water regime |
|
Comments |
|
Category of wetland (Undisturbed, created, urban, agricultural, coloured, saline, acidic, etc) |
Urban wetland |
Natural wetland but highly modified/disturbed; vegetation almost entirely cleared and much later replanted; previously used as a drain, grow tomatoes; dredging; artificially aerated. |
|
Semeniuk Vegetation Classification |
Bacata form |
|
|
Water regime (permanent, seasonal, episodic) |
Permanent |
Originally seasonal but now kept topped up over summer for aesthetic values and as a refuge for birdlife |
|
Mean depth of sampling sites (X ± SE) (n) |
67cm ± 4.0 cm |
Range over 5 sites of 50-95cm |
|
Estimated maximum depth of wetland |
~1.5m |
Lake over 2.5m deep in winter |
|
Soil association |
Bassendeen sands |
|
|
Sediment types |
Anoxic |
Odiferous gas escapes when pressure is applied |
|
Water Quality |
|
|
|
Temperature °C |
20.5°C |
||
pH (X ± SE) (n) |
7.52 ± 0.02 |
(5 sites) |
|
conductivity (µS/cm) (X ± SE) (n) |
14.40 ± 0.17 |
(5 sites) |
|
gilvin (g440/m) (X ± SE) (n) |
4.099 ± 0.161 |
(5 sites) |
|
turbidity (NTU) (X ± SE) (n) |
8.61 ± 1.27 |
Higher than actual value – sediment easily disturbed when taking samples (5 sites) |
|
Secchi disc (m) (n) |
0.67 ± 0.04 |
(5 sites) |
|
P04 (µg/l) (n) |
370 |
Bulked water sample from 5 sites |
|
NH4 (µg/l) (n) |
900 |
Bulked water sample from 5 sites |
|
N03 (µg/l) (n) |
210 |
Bulked water sample from 5 sites |
|
chlorophyll a (µg/l) (n) |
7.8 |
Bulked water sample from 5 sites |
|
Aquatic Plants |
|
||
Total no. of species |
3 |
|
|
Total no. of macrophyte species |
2 |
|
|
Total no. of algal species |
1 |
|
|
Names of most abundant macrophyte taxa |
Najas marina |
Less than 10% cover, but most abundant |
|
Names of most abundant algal taxa |
spirogyra sp. |
Found at most sites in small quantities |
|
Total per cent cover |
~10% |
|
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
~5-10% |
|
|
Exotic index |
0 |
|
|
Health (excellent/average/poor) |
Average |
Would not normally be so bad (probably average) |
|
Fringing Vegetation |
|
|
|
No. of plant communities |
1 |
|
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
~5% |
Averaged of estimated data |
|
Dominant community 1: |
Restored Foreshore |
(Project initiated in 2002) |
|
Percent of wetland area covered |
~5% |
|
|
Names of most abundant taxa |
Hypocolema augustifolia |
Five sites were sampled in this community |
|
Total % cover (up to 300%) |
120% |
|
|
Exotic index |
17.5% |
||
Dominant community 2: |
|
||
Percent of wetland area covered |
|
||
Total number of species |
|
||
Names of most abundant taxa |
|
||
Structure index |
|
||
Total % cover (up to 300%) |
|
||
Exotic index |
|
||
Health (excellent/average/poor) |
|
||
Terrestrial Vegetation |
|
||
No. of plant communities |
3 |
|
|
Percent of wetland perimeter covered |
90% |
|
|
Dominant community |
Remnant woodland |
|
|
Percent of wetland perimeter covered |
~30% |
|
|
Total number of species |
8 |
|
|
Names of most abundant taxa |
Melaleuca preissiana |
|
|
Structure index |
3 |
Seems very high for an urban wetland! |
|
Total % cover (up to 300%) |
3 |
Seems very high for an urban wetland! |
|
Exotic index |
85% |
Gr AA had high exotic index and "excellent" health. Am I missing something or are they? |
|
Health (excellent/average/poor) |
Average/poor |
|
|
Aquatic Invertebrates |
|
||
Mean no. of taxa (X ± SE) (n) |
5.6 ± 0.46 |
||
Names of most abundant taxa |
Corixidae |
|
|
Mean no. of predatory E) (n) |
1.2 ± 0.84 |
||
Indicator species present |
Corixidae |
|
|
Dominance of Insecta vs Crustacea |
Crustacea |
|
|
State(clear, macrophyte-dominated/ turbid , phytoplankton dominated/clear, benthic mat dominated) |
Clear |
|
|
Human Impacts |
|
||
Disturbance (high/med/low):in water |
High |
|
|
Disturbance (high/med/low):in fringing vegetation |
High |
Some litter, drains, cleared for roadways, boardwalk, high exotic species index |
|
Number of drains |
12 |
|
|